Use of silica fume and natural volcanic ash as a replacement to Portland cement: Micro and pore structural investigation using NMR, XRD, FTIR and X-ray microtomography

Kunal Kupwade-Patil, Steven D. Palkovic, Ali Bumajdad, Carmen Soriano, Oral Büyüköztürk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

172 Scopus citations

Abstract

This work investigates the effectiveness of the use of volcanic ash along with silica fume as a partial replacement for Portland cement. Multiple mix combinations of volcanic ash, silica fume and Portland cement were examined using various pore and microstructure characterization techniques. Hardened cement pastes were cured for 28 days and their pore and microstructures were examined using X-ray Microtomography, Magic Angle Spinning (MAS) Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) for 27Al and 29Si, X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy (FTIR). Microstructure examination of mixes prepared with volcanic ash, silica fume and Portland cement revealed the co-existance of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and calcium–alumino-silicate-hydrate (C-A-S-H) gels, along with other hydration products that led to a reduction in porosity and densification of the cement matrix. These findings indicate that volcanic ash along with silica fume is a viable substitute for Portland cement up to 40% and provides a sustainable, cost effective and environmentally friendly solution to volcanic ash disposal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)574-590
Number of pages17
JournalConstruction and Building Materials
Volume158
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Jan 2018

Keywords

  • Microstructure
  • NMR spectroscopy
  • Pore structure
  • Volcanic ash
  • X-ray microtomography

Funding Agency

  • Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of silica fume and natural volcanic ash as a replacement to Portland cement: Micro and pore structural investigation using NMR, XRD, FTIR and X-ray microtomography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this