TY - JOUR
T1 - Thromboprophylaxis for inpatient with advanced cancer receiving palliative care
T2 - A retrospective study
AU - Al-Ansari, Ameena Mohammed
AU - Abd-El-Gawad, Wafaa Mostafa
AU - AboSerea, Sobhi Mostafa
AU - Ali, Ali Adli
AU - Abdullah, Maha Mohammed
AU - Ali, Fatma Abdel Shakor
AU - ElShereafy, Eman El Sayed
AU - Bahnasy, Mohamed Abd El Badie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Objectives: The benefits and risks of thromboprophylaxis usage in patients with advanced cancer at the end of their lives remain unknown, especially with the lack of randomized studies. This study aimed to describe the clinical use of thromboprophylaxis in those patients under palliative care. Methods: A retrospective cohort study. It was performed on patients admitted to the Palliative Care Center. Results: A total of 719 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 62.97 (13.65) years. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence was 5.4% (n = 39). At the time of admission, 31.29% (n = 225) of patients were on thromboprophylaxis. At death time, 17.5% (n = 126) of patients were on thromboprophylaxis (41.3% on primary and 58.7% on secondary thromboprophylaxis). The incidence of clinically suspected fatal VTE was 6.5% (n = 47). Surprisingly, clinically suspected VTE was higher statistically in patients with thromboprophylaxis rather than in non-thromboprophylaxis (p <.001). By using linear regression, only higher PPI scores on admission were independent negative predictors of length of stay (OR:4.429, 95% CI: 5.460–3.398, p <.001). The development of clinically suspected fatal VTE, whatever the status of thromboprophylaxis, did not affect the length of stay. Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis does not decrease the risk of clinically suspected fatal VTE in patients with advanced disease in their terminal phase. Patients with poor performance status and a short prognosis are unlikely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis.
AB - Objectives: The benefits and risks of thromboprophylaxis usage in patients with advanced cancer at the end of their lives remain unknown, especially with the lack of randomized studies. This study aimed to describe the clinical use of thromboprophylaxis in those patients under palliative care. Methods: A retrospective cohort study. It was performed on patients admitted to the Palliative Care Center. Results: A total of 719 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 62.97 (13.65) years. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence was 5.4% (n = 39). At the time of admission, 31.29% (n = 225) of patients were on thromboprophylaxis. At death time, 17.5% (n = 126) of patients were on thromboprophylaxis (41.3% on primary and 58.7% on secondary thromboprophylaxis). The incidence of clinically suspected fatal VTE was 6.5% (n = 47). Surprisingly, clinically suspected VTE was higher statistically in patients with thromboprophylaxis rather than in non-thromboprophylaxis (p <.001). By using linear regression, only higher PPI scores on admission were independent negative predictors of length of stay (OR:4.429, 95% CI: 5.460–3.398, p <.001). The development of clinically suspected fatal VTE, whatever the status of thromboprophylaxis, did not affect the length of stay. Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis does not decrease the risk of clinically suspected fatal VTE in patients with advanced disease in their terminal phase. Patients with poor performance status and a short prognosis are unlikely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis.
KW - anticoagulation
KW - cancer
KW - palliative care
KW - thromboprophylaxis
KW - venous thromboembolism
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85135214983
U2 - 10.1111/ejh.13834
DO - 10.1111/ejh.13834
M3 - Article
C2 - 35871389
AN - SCOPUS:85135214983
SN - 0902-4441
VL - 109
SP - 494
EP - 503
JO - European Journal of Haematology
JF - European Journal of Haematology
IS - 5
ER -