TY - JOUR
T1 - High-performance ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cell optimized by silvaco tools
AU - Boukortt, Nour El I.
AU - Adouane, Mabrouk
AU - AlHammadi, Rawan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 International Solar Energy Society
PY - 2021/11/1
Y1 - 2021/11/1
N2 - In this work, we investigated the influence of the cell pitch, opening width, Ga/(In + Ga) ratio, absorber layer thickness, and doping on ultrathin CIGS solar cell performance by using ATLAS tools. First, to validate our investigated solar cell, we discuss and compare our simulation models with fabricated cells with/without rear-passivation Al2O3/Cu(In1−xGax)Se2. We observed significant improvements in cell performance while using a thin film Al2O3 for the rear-passivation with a high density of negative charge, where the rear side contact recombination losses can then be reduced. The simulation results follow the experimental trends, highlighting the beneficial effects of rear-passivation in the ultrathin absorber layer. However, poor passivation was observed when a rear-passivation layer is with a high density of positive charge or in high contact resistance at Ag/CIGS interface. Consequently, the optimum combination led to achieving 14.30% with 1016 cm−3, 2.5 µm, and 250 nm for absorber doping, cell pitch, and cell width, respectively. The obtained results from the simulated cells were compared to the recently published research work.
AB - In this work, we investigated the influence of the cell pitch, opening width, Ga/(In + Ga) ratio, absorber layer thickness, and doping on ultrathin CIGS solar cell performance by using ATLAS tools. First, to validate our investigated solar cell, we discuss and compare our simulation models with fabricated cells with/without rear-passivation Al2O3/Cu(In1−xGax)Se2. We observed significant improvements in cell performance while using a thin film Al2O3 for the rear-passivation with a high density of negative charge, where the rear side contact recombination losses can then be reduced. The simulation results follow the experimental trends, highlighting the beneficial effects of rear-passivation in the ultrathin absorber layer. However, poor passivation was observed when a rear-passivation layer is with a high density of positive charge or in high contact resistance at Ag/CIGS interface. Consequently, the optimum combination led to achieving 14.30% with 1016 cm−3, 2.5 µm, and 250 nm for absorber doping, cell pitch, and cell width, respectively. The obtained results from the simulated cells were compared to the recently published research work.
KW - Absorber
KW - Pitch
KW - Rear-passivation
KW - Recombination
KW - Ultrathin CIGS
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85115908857
U2 - 10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.072
DO - 10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.072
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85115908857
SN - 0038-092X
VL - 228
SP - 282
EP - 289
JO - Solar Energy
JF - Solar Energy
ER -